Theory In Science


Photo by Pixabay on

Campbell Biology

“It’s just a theory!” Our everyday use of the term theory often implies an untested speculation. But the term theory has a different meaning in science. What is a scientific theory, and how is it different from a hypothesis or from mere speculation?

First, a scientific theory is much broader in scope than a hypothesis. This is a hypothesis: “Coat coloration wellmatched to their habitat is an adaptation that protects mice from predators.” But this is a theory: “Evolutionary adaptations arise by natural selection.” This theory proposes that natural selection is the evolutionary mechanism that accounts for an enormous variety of adaptations, of which coat color in mice is but one example.

Second, a theory is general enough to spin off many new, testable hypotheses. For example, the theory of natural selection motivated two researchers at Princeton University, Peter and Rosemary Grant, to test the specific hypothesis that the beaks of Galápagos finches evolve in response to changes in the types of available food.

And third, compared to any one hypothesis, a theory is generally supported by a much greater body of evidence. The theory of natural selection has been supported by a vast quantity of evidence, with more being found every day, and has not been contradicted by any scientific data. Those theories that become widely adopted in science (such as the theory of natural selection and the theory of gravity) explain a great diversity of observations and are supported by a vast accumulation of evidence.

In spite of the body of evidence supporting a widely accepted theory, scientists will sometimes modify or even reject theories when new research produces results that don’t fit. For example, biologists once lumped bacteria and archaea together as a kingdom of prokaryotes. When new methods for comparing cells and molecules could be used to test such relationships, the evidence led scientists to reject the theory that bacteria and archaea are members of the same kingdom. If there is “truth” in science, it is at best conditional, based on the weight of available evidence.


Urry, Lisa A.. Campbell Biology. Pearson Education. Kindle Edition.


0 0 vote
Article Rating
Notify of
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments