Theory In Science


Related Posts:


Photo by Pixabay on Pexels.com

Theory In Science (Campbell Biology)

“It’s just a theory!” Our everyday use of the term theory often implies an untested speculation. But the term theory has a different meaning in science. What is a scientific theory, and how is it different from a hypothesis or from mere speculation?

First, a scientific theory is much broader in scope than a hypothesis. This is a hypothesis: “Coat coloration wellmatched to their habitat is an adaptation that protects mice from predators.” But this is a theory: “Evolutionary adaptations arise by natural selection.” This theory proposes that natural selection is the evolutionary mechanism that accounts for an enormous variety of adaptations, of which coat color in mice is but one example.

Second, a theory is general enough to spin off many new, testable hypotheses. For example, the theory of natural selection motivated two researchers at Princeton University, Peter and Rosemary Grant, to test the specific hypothesis that the beaks of Galápagos finches evolve in response to changes in the types of available food.

And third, compared to any one hypothesis, a theory is generally supported by a much greater body of evidence. The theory of natural selection has been supported by a vast quantity of evidence, with more being found every day, and has not been contradicted by any scientific data. Those theories that become widely adopted in science (such as the theory of natural selection and the theory of gravity) explain a great diversity of observations and are supported by a vast accumulation of evidence.

In spite of the body of evidence supporting a widely accepted theory, scientists will sometimes modify or even reject theories when new research produces results that don’t fit. For example, biologists once lumped bacteria and archaea together as a kingdom of prokaryotes. When new methods for comparing cells and molecules could be used to test such relationships, the evidence led scientists to reject the theory that bacteria and archaea are members of the same kingdom. If there is “truth” in science, it is at best conditional, based on the weight of available evidence.

Source:

Urry, Lisa A.. Campbell Biology. Pearson Education. Kindle Edition. https://www.pearson.com/us/higher-education/series/Campbell-Biology-Series/2244849.html

Related Research

Research Article: Creative Research Science Experiences for High School Students

Date Published: September 21, 2010 Publisher: Public Library of Science Author(s): Constance Hammond, David Karlin, Jean Thimonier, Cheryl A. Kerfeld Abstract: A French research institute raises the bar for public outreach with an educational laboratory that engages 1,000 high school students per year in mini research projects. Partial Text: The influence of scientific discoveries on … Continue reading

Research Article: “Antedisciplinary” Science

Date Published: June 24, 2005 Publisher: Public Library of Science Author(s): Sean R Eddy Abstract: None Partial Text: Reading this made me a little depressed. For starters, the phrase “organizational models for team science” makes me imagine a factory floor of scientists toiling away on their next 100-author paper under the watchful gaze of their … Continue reading

Research Article: Science in the News

Date Published: February 14, 2006 Publisher: Public Library of Science Author(s): Hemai Parthasarathy Abstract: Do press embargoes hurt or help the reporting of science news? Partial Text: An article in PLoS Biology was downloaded more than 40,000 times in the span of a single November week. It was not a cure for cancer, it was … Continue reading

Research Article: Turning to Science

Date Published: January 18, 2005 Publisher: Public Library of Science Author(s): Hemai Parthasarathy Abstract: A review of John Brockman’s new book Curious Minds: How a Child Becomes a Scientist. Partial Text: Do you want your child to grow up to be a scientist? If so, then by all means follow the roadmaps set down by … Continue reading

Research Article: Talking Science

Date Published: July 13, 2004 Publisher: Public Library of Science Author(s): Ludmila Pollock Abstract: The Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Oral History Collection presents interviews with over 80 leading scientists, drawn from the fields of molecular biology and genetics. Partial Text: “…where people do come with a sense that there’s going to be openness. That there’s … Continue reading