Research Article: Chronic pain patients can be classified into four groups: Clustering-based discriminant analysis of psychometric data from 4665 patients referred to a multidisciplinary pain centre (a SQRP study)

Date Published: February 8, 2018

Publisher: Public Library of Science

Author(s): Emmanuel Bäckryd, Elisabeth B. Persson, Annelie Inghilesi Larsson, Marcelo Rivano Fischer, Björn Gerdle, Ethan Moitra.

http://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0192623

Abstract

To subgroup chronic pain patients using psychometric data and regress the variables most responsible for subgroup discrimination.

Cross-sectional, registry-based study.

Chronic pain patients assessed at a multidisciplinary pain centre between 2008 and 2015.

Data from the Swedish quality registry for pain rehabilitation (SQRP) were retrieved and analysed by principal component analysis, hierarchical clustering analysis, and partial least squares–discriminant analysis.

Four subgroups were identified. Group 1 was characterized by low “psychological strain”, the best relative situation concerning pain characteristics (intensity and spreading), the lowest frequency of fibromyalgia, as well as by a slightly older age. Group 2 was characterized by high “psychological strain” and by the most negative situation with respect to pain characteristics (intensity and spreading). Group 3 was characterized by high “social distress”, the longest pain durations, and a statistically higher frequency of females. The frequency of three neuropathic pain conditions was generally lower in this group. Group 4 was characterized by high psychological strain, low “social distress”, and high pain intensity.

The identification of these four clusters of chronic pain patients could be useful for the development of personalized rehabilitation programs. For example, the identification of a subgroup characterized mainly by high perceived “social distress” raises the question of how to best design interventions for such patients. Differentiating between clinically important subgroups and comparing how these subgroups respond to interventions is arguably an important area for further research.

Partial Text

Chronic pain with moderate to severe intensity affects about 20% of the general population [1] and available treatment strategies rarely provide adequate analgesia [2]. A visionary goal for pain medicine would be the ability of basing analgesic treatment and other interventions–e.g., multimodal rehabilitation programs (MMRP)–on a precise understanding of the mechanisms of different pain conditions [3, 4]. It seems probable that prevalent pain syndromes such as chronic widespread pain (CWP) or unspecific chronic low back pain (CLBP) are heterogeneous categories encompassing different (albeit probably inter-related) mechanisms. However, in randomized controlled trials, systematic reviews, and meta-analyses, these broad conditions are often regarded as homogenous categories [5, 6]. Hence, true treatment effects may be “diluted” because only a subgroup of patients respond.

The major findings of the study were that the four groups/clusters were identified, which had the following characteristics:

 

Source:

http://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0192623

 

0 0 vote
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
guest
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments