Research Article: Estimated stroke risk, yield, and number needed to screen for atrial fibrillation detected through single time screening: a multicountry patient-level meta-analysis of 141,220 screened individuals

Date Published: September 25, 2019

Publisher: Public Library of Science

Author(s): Nicole Lowres, Jake Olivier, Tze-Fan Chao, Shih-Ann Chen, Yi Chen, Axel Diederichsen, David A. Fitzmaurice, Juan Jose Gomez-Doblas, Joseph Harbison, Jeff S. Healey, F. D. Richard Hobbs, Femke Kaasenbrood, William Keen, Vivian W. Lee, Jes S. Lindholt, Gregory Y. H. Lip, Georges H. Mairesse, Jonathan Mant, Julie W. Martin, Enrique Martín-Rioboó, David D. McManus, Javier Muñiz, Thomas Münzel, Juliet Nakamya, Lis Neubeck, Jessica J. Orchard, Luis Ángel Pérula de Torres, Marco Proietti, F. Russell Quinn, Andrea K. Roalfe, Roopinder K. Sandhu, Renate B. Schnabel, Breda Smyth, Apurv Soni, Robert Tieleman, Jiguang Wang, Philipp S. Wild, Bryan P. Yan, Ben Freedman, Joshua Z. Willey

Abstract: BackgroundThe precise age distribution and calculated stroke risk of screen-detected atrial fibrillation (AF) is not known. Therefore, it is not possible to determine the number needed to screen (NNS) to identify one treatable new AF case (NNS-Rx) (i.e., Class-1 oral anticoagulation [OAC] treatment recommendation) in each age stratum. If the NNS-Rx is known for each age stratum, precise cost-effectiveness and sensitivity simulations can be performed based on the age distribution of the population/region to be screened. Such calculations are required by national authorities and organisations responsible for health system budgets to determine the best age cutoffs for screening programs and decide whether programs of screening should be funded. Therefore, we aimed to determine the exact yield and calculated stroke-risk profile of screen-detected AF and NNS-Rx in 5-year age strata.Methods and findingsA systematic review of Medline, Pubmed, and Embase was performed (January 2007 to February 2018), and AF-SCREEN international collaboration members were contacted to identify additional studies. Twenty-four eligible studies were identified that performed a single time point screen for AF in a general ambulant population, including people ≥65 years. Authors from eligible studies were invited to collaborate and share patient-level data. Statistical analysis was performed using random effects logistic regression for AF detection rate, and Poisson regression modelling for CHA2DS2-VASc scores. Nineteen studies (14 countries from a mix of low- to middle- and high-income countries) collaborated, with 141,220 participants screened and 1,539 new AF cases. Pooled yield of screening was greater in males across all age strata. The age/sex-adjusted detection rate for screen-detected AF in ≥65-year-olds was 1.44% (95% CI, 1.13%–1.82%) and 0.41% (95% CI, 0.31%–0.53%) for <65-year-olds. New AF detection rate increased progressively with age from 0.34% (<60 years) to 2.73% (≥85 years). Neither the choice of screening methodology or device, the geographical region, nor the screening setting influenced the detection rate of AF. Mean CHA2DS2-VASc scores (n = 1,369) increased with age from 1.1 (<60 years) to 3.9 (≥85 years); 72% of ≥65 years had ≥1 additional stroke risk factor other than age/sex. All new AF ≥75 years and 66% between 65 and 74 years had a Class-1 OAC recommendation. The NNS-Rx is 83 for ≥65 years, 926 for 60–64 years; and 1,089 for <60 years. The main limitation of this study is there are insufficient data on sociodemographic variables of the populations and possible ascertainment biases to explain the variance in the samples.ConclusionsPeople with screen-detected AF are at elevated calculated stroke risk: above age 65, the majority have a Class-1 OAC recommendation for stroke prevention, and >70% have ≥1 additional stroke risk factor other than age/sex. Our data, based on the largest number of screen-detected AF collected to date, show the precise relationship between yield and estimated stroke risk profile with age, and strong dependence for NNS-RX on the age distribution of the population to be screened: essential information for precise cost-effectiveness calculations.

Partial Text: The role of opportunistic or systematic atrial fibrillation (AF) screening for people aged ≥65 years remains contested, with variation in recommendations between international AF clinical guidelines. However, 10% of all ischaemic strokes are in individuals with undiagnosed AF [1], and early identification of AF and appropriate guideline-based oral anticoagulation (OAC) treatment can prevent strokes and thus reduce health costs related to AF [2]. Organisations supporting the recommendation to screen include the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) [3], the European Heart Rhythm Association [4], the Royal College of Physicians of Edinburgh [5], AF-SCREEN International Collaboration [6], and, recently, the Heart Foundation of Australia and the Cardiac Society of Australia and New Zealand [7].

This systematic review and patient-level meta-analysis was performed in accordance with the preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analysis (S1 PRISMA checklist) and the meta-analyses of observational studies in epidemiology guidelines [9,10]. All collaborating studies had ethical approval for their study, the details of which are reported in the individual study manuscripts [11–29]. Ethical approval was not required for this collaborative secondary analysis of data.

The search strategy identified 41 screening studies, of which 17 did not meet the eligibility criteria (Fig 1). Study authors from the 24 eligible studies were contacted via email, and 19 studies [11–29] from 14 countries agreed to the collaboration and contributed screening data.

To our knowledge, this is the first study to show the actual yield of screen-detected AF and estimated stroke risk by age group, in very large numbers. Our data show that both yield and stroke risk are very sensitive to age, and the estimated stroke risk profile of new cases is high. When screening ≥65 years, the detection rate of new AF cases is 1.44% (95% CI, 1.13%–1.82%), and 84% of new AF cases have a Class-1 recommendation for OAC prophylaxis. Of note, under the 2016 Canadian AF Guidelines, all people aged ≥65 years receive an OAC recommendation based on age alone [34]. The high stroke risk profile is not solely due to age and sex, as 72% of new cases aged ≥65 years have at least one additional CHA2DS2-VASc stroke risk factor (comorbidity) other than age or sex. As expected, with increasing age there is a corresponding continuous increase in the detection rate of new AF, mean CHA2DS2-VASc scores, and additional CHA2DS2-VASc stroke risk factors. The yield of screening was higher in men across all age groups, even though larger numbers of women were screened.

Source:

http://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1002903

 

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.