Research Article: The effectiveness of Realistic Mathematics Education approach: The role of mathematical representation as mediator between mathematical belief and problem solving

Date Published: September 27, 2018

Publisher: Public Library of Science

Author(s): Putri Yuanita, Hutkemri Zulnaidi, Effandi Zakaria, Christine E. King.

http://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0204847

Abstract

This study aims to identify the role of mathematical representation as a mediator between mathematical belief and problem solving. A quasi-experimental design was developed that included 426 Form 1 secondary school students. Respondents comprised 209 and 217 students in the treatment and control groups, respectively. SPSS 23.0, ANATES 4 and Amos 18 were used for data analysis. Findings indicated that mathematical representation plays a significant role as mediator between mathematical belief and arithmetic problem solving. The Realistic Mathematics Education (RME) approach successfully increased the arithmetic problem-solving ability of students.

Partial Text

Education equips younger generations with important skills and knowledge. Effective learning enables students to learn through creative teaching methods and acquire knowledge in class; the latter becomes an exciting activity through the effort of teachers [1]. Mathematics education motivates students to become critical and innovative and to cultivate sound reasoning in problem solving. Mathematics education is an active, dynamic and continuous process; activities in mathematics education help students develop their reasoning, think logically, systematically, critically and thoroughly and adopt an objective and open attitude when dealing with problems [2]. Teaching and learning consist of three main components, namely, teachers, students and content. Students must be equipped with knowledge and high-level skills and teachers must possess knowledge and professionalism. Problem-solving skills enable students to think creatively and critically by using progressive and challenging thought processes; creative and critical thinking will help develop a nation and address its needs [3]. Teaching and learning processes in the classroom serve as a study ground for researchers. A future educator can determine effective teaching methods through this process. Teachers and students in Indonesia acknowledge the need to improve the current status of teaching and learning mathematics. Since 1970, Indonesia has applied a modern approach towards teaching mathematics. However, this approach has created problematic situations in various schools.

Varying teaching styles increases the difficulty of learning and understanding mathematics. Moreover, students are afraid of mathematics [6]. The research object in mathematics is abstract and traditional teaching approaches are ill suited for such matters. The unsatisfactory understanding of mathematics and performances of students are attributed to several factors. Firstly, teachers dominate the learning process of a classroom by applying unidirectional and traditional teaching methods. According to Roberg [18], traditional learning focuses on skill and concept acquisition. Thus, this approach is unsuitable for improving problem solving skills. Secondly, teachers merely present theories and definitions. For example, a theorem is explained through examples and students are assessed through a series of exercises and questions. Teaching is the process of obtaining facts from definitions, attributes and formulas in the mathematics textbook of students. Teachers simply follow the steps given in textbooks without considering whether the process is correct or not. Thus, the learning process becomes mechanical, wherein teachers simply set formulas and solutions for students [19]. Findings on the application of modern mathematics show that mathematical learning is a low-value learning process [6].

Students who were taught using the RME approach had higher mathematical belief than students who were exposed to the traditional method. The use of RME increased the confidence of students in mathematics, especially in arithmetic, as reflected in their active participation in the activities presented with the RME approach. According to Fauzan [47], active students use the RME approach, which develops creative thinking and lessens uncertainty towards mathematics. However, the use of the traditional method successfully increased the mathematical belief of students, although the RME approach had better effect. Saragih [48] stated that the advantage of the RME approach is its ability to strengthen students’ interest in mathematics. The findings supported Lee, Zeleke and Mavrotheris [30] who asserted that the RME approach enables students to learn mathematics actively such that their belief can increase through the effort of teachers. Greer, Verschaffel and de Corte [31] supported this idea by stating that the mathematical belief of students is influenced by factors, such as teachers, textbooks, learning strategies and use of problems that exist in the surroundings of students for learning activities.

The use of RME can increase mathematical belief, representation and problem solving skills. This approach successfully trains students to formulate their own ideas from real-life situations or experiences. Teachers must be encouraged to use the RME approach in teaching and learning mathematics. Efforts pertaining to mathematical representation should be doubled to increase the mathematical problem solving skills of students. The belief of students is another major factor in increasing mathematical problem solving skills. Cooperation from all sides should be improved to encourage the use of the RME approach in teaching and learning mathematics at all school levels to increase mathematical belief, representation and problem solving. This study seeks to serve as a stepping stone for future studies to expand the use of the RME approach from the national to the international level.

 

Source:

http://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0204847

 

0 0 vote
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
guest
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments